<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Christopher Price .net &#187; Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherprice.net/category/television/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherprice.net</link>
	<description>Wireless consumer advocate Christopher Price tackles the rest of tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>They Just Don&#8217;t Get It: Silent Ads Don&#8217;t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/they-just-dont-get-it-silent-ads-dont-work-1391.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/they-just-dont-get-it-silent-ads-dont-work-1391.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silent ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncharted 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw what may be the biggest waste of advertising money, ever. It was a 90 second TV ad for Uncharted 2. The problem? Nearly half the commercial involved people talking… in a silent ad. For those of you not familiar, I coined the term Silent Ads for variants of ads that cut out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw what may be the biggest waste of advertising money, ever. It was a 90 second TV ad for Uncharted 2.</p>
<p>The problem? Nearly half the commercial involved people talking… in a silent ad.</p>
<p>For those of you not familiar, I coined the term Silent Ads for variants of ads that cut out all speech, in favor of running just the music of the commercial. Making multiple variants of ads is a timeless tradition, but Silent Ads are a new (and very lame) variant of advertising, aimed at the lowest of intellects.</p>
<p>It is true, Silent Ads do work with dumb people. This is why ad agencies con companies into devoting part of their budgets to them. I&#8217;m being very scientific when I say dumb; advertisers classify audiences by intelligence. But, Silent Ads also have a downside, they dovetail and tick off people with high intellects. Those are the informed consumers that wind up saying/tweeting/blogging/sharing &#8220;hey, don&#8217;t buy that annoying crud.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bottom line, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see Uncharted 2 underperform. You don&#8217;t win people over by running ads with 45 seconds of lips moving… and nothing but music on the audio track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/they-just-dont-get-it-silent-ads-dont-work-1391.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Forget History: Original iPhone &amp; TV Out</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/dont-forget-history-original-iphone-tv-out-1063.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/dont-forget-history-original-iphone-tv-out-1063.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of buzz about HD and iPhone lately. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard something about that by now. But, let&#8217;s take a look at history for a second first, just in case the crowds at Moscone West decide revolt if Apple doesn&#8217;t announce iPhone HD at WWDC. When the original iPhone came [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of buzz about HD and iPhone lately. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.phonenews.com/apple-consolidating-av-cables-ahead-of-iphone-hd-launch-7648/">heard something</a> about that by now.</p>
<p>But, let&#8217;s take a look at history for a second first, just in case the crowds at Moscone West decide revolt if Apple doesn&#8217;t announce iPhone HD at WWDC.</p>
<p>When the original iPhone came out, Apple categorically denied that it was even capable of TV Out. Time and time again, Apple Media Relations clearly stated that the iPhone lacked the hardware to output video.</p>
<p>Then iPhone OS 2.0 came out, along with 480i (SDTV) video output on each and every iPhone and iPod Touch. iPod touch 2G then went 480p at the next revision.</p>
<p>Will Apple announce iPhone HD at WWDC? I have no idea. I do know that you shouldn&#8217;t shoot the messenger if they don&#8217;t. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/dont-forget-history-original-iphone-tv-out-1063.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once Again, 24 Rips Off Metal Gear Solid (Spoiler Alert)</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/once-again-24-rips-off-metal-gear-solid-spoiler-alert-1002.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/once-again-24-rips-off-metal-gear-solid-spoiler-alert-1002.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david palmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack bauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony almeda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scarred and tired, Jack Bauer has been infected by a supervirus and must take on a derelict PMC, hellbent on world domination. Sound familiar? If you&#8217;ve played Metal Gear Solid 4, you&#8217;ve officially been there and done that. I&#8217;ve long talked off-the-blog about 24&#8242;s continual ripping off of Metal Gear Solid. People have finally started [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Scarred and tired, Jack Bauer has been infected by a supervirus and must take on a derelict PMC, hellbent on world domination.</em></p>
<p><center><img title="youngsnake" src="http://www.christopherprice.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/youngsnake-300x258.jpg" alt="youngsnake" width="300" height="258" /> <img  title="jack-bauer-resurrection" src="http://www.christopherprice.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/jack-bauer-resurrection-250x250.jpg" alt="jack-bauer-resurrection" width="250" height="250" /></center></p>
<p>Sound familiar? If you&#8217;ve played Metal Gear Solid 4, you&#8217;ve officially been there and done that. I&#8217;ve long talked off-the-blog about 24&#8242;s continual ripping off of Metal Gear Solid. People have finally started listening to me after I noted continuously that Tony Almeda (<em>aka Raiden</em>) would rise from the dead.</p>
<p>Spoiler alert. (Cease reading if you don&#8217;t want to know what happens next on 24&#8230; or if you haven&#8217;t played all the Metal Gear games.) <span id="more-1002"></span></p>
<p>President David Palmer (shot in the head) will be back too. The clock didn&#8217;t stop counting (which happens whenever a key protagonist dies), but people didn&#8217;t listen to me about that happening when Almeda was &#8220;killed.&#8221; He&#8217;ll make an appearance later this season. It&#8217;s not clear just yet if Palmer (who had an almost <em>brotherly</em> bond formed with Bauer prior to the series beginning) will take on the Solidus role of mixed-up-bad-guy-that-used-to-be-president.</p>
<p>Oh, and you can start playing the Father &amp; Son theme from the end of MGS4. Intel confirms Jack&#8217;s father will be back for some healing aww-he&#8217;s-not-so-bad moment (don&#8217;t count on that for this season, but it&#8217;s in the cards). For those of you not familiar with the 20-year-running Metal Gear saga, Solid Snake battled, and killed his genetic father, Big Boss, twice&#8230; only to find him rise from the dead for the series finale.</p>
<p>My point to all of this is not to ruin 24 for you. It&#8217;s a great show. And don&#8217;t worry, Jack Bauer wasn&#8217;t made in a test tube. Though John Voight is probably going to wind up being a dead ringer for Ocelot (don&#8217;t say I didn&#8217;t warn you). I just think it&#8217;s worthy of pointing out where they get their material from. And, that crosses into the tech sector&#8230; which is my domain.</p>
<p>On one final note, kudos to Apple for putting down the money for a formal endorsement. After years of Macs being featured, Apple paid the token gesture amount to have Mac OS X featured. The 24 team is a huge fan of all-things-Apple, and Apple got a free ride for years with countless product placements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/once-again-24-rips-off-metal-gear-solid-spoiler-alert-1002.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Take on Hulu vs Boxee</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/my-take-on-hulu-vs-boxee-967.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/my-take-on-hulu-vs-boxee-967.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boxee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t written before on the Hulu vs Boxee battle that is unfolding, and a couple of folks have asked me to chime in. As a reference, while I have used both apps, I don&#8217;t use the pairing of Boxee to access Hulu myself. However, the battle being played out over the interoperability (or lack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t written before on the Hulu vs Boxee battle that is unfolding, and a couple of folks have asked me to chime in. As a reference, while I have used both apps, I don&#8217;t use the pairing of Boxee to access Hulu myself. However, the battle being played out over the interoperability (or lack thereof) does bring up a couple of important points.</p>
<p>In case you missed the latest chapter in the saga, after Hulu disconnected Boxee&#8217;s custom plug-in, Boxee went the innovative, open route and wrote an RSS parser, a la Podcaster. This gave Boxee a similar interface as before to access Hulu content, but did so without any custom API or other form of access to Hulu. So, Hulu yesterday blocked Boxee&#8217;s browser identifier, effectively shutting legitimate users out, simply because their computers identified to Hulu that their browser was running inside of Boxee.</p>
<p>Boxee responded to Hulu&#8217;s action noting this, stating that Boxee is just now a glorified RSS reader, pointed at Hulu&#8217;s site by default. Boxee already has a fix, and that simply was to change the identifier to Firefox. Now Hulu can&#8217;t tell the difference between the Firefox browser, and Boxee loading Hulu&#8217;s feeds.</p>
<p>My take on this is simple: Hulu and its content-providing backers should back off of blocking Boxee. No, not because they&#8217;re afraid of their business model being undermined. No, not because they want a phased transition.</p>
<p>Why they should is simple: They&#8217;re making Boxee more popular by opening this can of worms. Boxee is an underdeveloped product that landed a Series A round of venture capital funding. Its success is far from guaranteed. However, every time Hulu tweaks Boxee, Boxee wins another round of media attention. It gets free press that money can&#8217;t buy, and gains probably tens of thousands of new users each time Hulu turns the page on this debacle.</p>
<p>And, that makes Boxee stronger. That makes them more likely to get more funding. That makes them more likely to be in a position where they won&#8217;t need Hulu. Hulu should be afraid of that, and the content providers would not like having to negotiate with multiple streaming TV stores.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to advise Hulu on what to do exactly, they aren&#8217;t paying my lofty-but-well-earned consulting fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/my-take-on-hulu-vs-boxee-967.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Without TV&#8230; For a Month (At Least)</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, paid TV at least. As my last post pointed out, I shut off U-Verse TV service. While it was a bumpy road to get U-Verse setup and trialed&#8230; I am moving this month, and it doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense to have tons of TV, when I have tons more work to do. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, paid TV at least. As my last post pointed out, I shut off U-Verse TV service. While it was a bumpy road to get U-Verse setup and trialed&#8230; I am moving this month, and it doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense to have tons of TV, when I have tons more work to do. I now have to juggle a startup, and a home moving at the same time.</p>
<p>So, I decided to save $60+ and cancel the TV service.</p>
<p>This is a good experiment. I want to see if I can live on online TV service, and over the air HDTV alone.</p>
<p>So far, I&#8217;m about one day in. I&#8217;ve already dusted off my TiVo HD and set it to OTA-only mode. After manually pulling the analog channels (which should have already been shut off, had the Obama administration held to the Feburary 17 shutdown time)&#8230; I&#8217;m all set.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a bumpy ride still. I have to admit, I&#8217;m in a bit of withdrawal. I&#8217;ve already pretty much drained my TiVo, which had an abundant storage of shows that I hadn&#8217;t watched (that time around). The OTA selection in the Sacramento valley is pretty small for my standards. There aren&#8217;t any looping runs of &#8217;90s sitcoms to burn the midnight oil with. I&#8217;ve caught myself scrolling through looking for a Cosby Show or Family Matters as background chatter&#8230; nothing.</p>
<p>TiVo Suggestions is still paying off though, it&#8217;s already coping itself with the short supply of content. For the first time, it&#8217;s pulling down PBS shows in desparation. But, it&#8217;s all the more valuable when there really is nothing worth watching on. And, when you only have five or six channels, that&#8217;s much more often.</p>
<p>Next step? Finding a good way to have internet TV at the ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day 4 of AT&amp;T U-Verse FUD: Outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/day-4-of-u-verse-fud-outrage-936.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/day-4-of-u-verse-fud-outrage-936.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad fit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fttl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u-verse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s getting pretty clear that the support chain at AT&#38;T U-Verse has already begun its disappointing, but expected decay. We are now three days in a row that maintenance technicians were supposed to come to my house, but haven&#8217;t. This was a simple wiring repair, and it has turned into half a work week of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s getting pretty clear that the support chain at AT&amp;T U-Verse has already begun its disappointing, but expected decay. We are now three days in a row that maintenance technicians were supposed to come to my house, but haven&#8217;t. This was a simple wiring repair, and it has turned into half a work week of downtime.</p>
<p>This is affecting my bottom line. It&#8217;s not okay.</p>
<p>I called into dispatch this afternoon, and I have been hung up on three times in a row. The phone rings through to someone, and then just cuts off. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s their phone system, or if they&#8217;re just acustomed to my caller ID number. I suspect the former, since I&#8217;ve tried on two different phones.</p>
<p>After that, I called the last premise tech (thankfully, he left his card), and he&#8217;s calling around to try and get to the bottom of why this is getting so screwed up.</p>
<p>Developing&#8230; very, very slowly.</p>
<p><strong>Update (9:40 PM):</strong> A lot actually started happening around 5 PM. Two maintenance technicians came out, and got to work. I got a call from Robert (one of the premise techs, and the first person I called after I couldn&#8217;t get dispatch to answer). Major praise to him for rescuing the job. He wouldn&#8217;t take no for an answer, and got the trucks rolling again.</p>
<p>They found the signal between my house and the VRAD was fine, albeit with some crosstalk. But, rather than just leave, they got on their phones and kept calling&#8230; until they found another premise tech to come out. I now have three big AT&amp;T trucks on my street at this point.</p>
<p>Ultimately, they decided to replace the Remote Gateway (that&#8217;s the modem and router combo box). That did fix the bad fit issue which Tier 2 Tech Support&#8230; but the connection was still bouncing arround. Every speed test either had the download rate screwed up, or the upload rate. That&#8217;s consistent with the issues that I&#8217;m having, as the connection runs fine climbing up to 18 mbps, then gets knocked down, only to start climbing back up again.</p>
<p>After I thought the maintenance techs had left (giving up really, none of us could come up with something else to try), they knocked on my door. They decided that since there was some crosstalk on the line, that replacing some of the line would indeed make sense&#8230; even though the diagnostics were coming back clear.</p>
<p>So, they&#8217;ll be back tomorrow to do that. If that doesn&#8217;t work, we&#8217;ll move on to replacing the line that AT&amp;T hijacked from U-Verse (the feed indoors). If that fails&#8230; I&#8217;ll be packing stuff up to move to Silicon Valley at that point, so I really don&#8217;t care. Hopefully U-Verse will work better at my new home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/day-4-of-u-verse-fud-outrage-936.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry Engadget, I don&#8217;t buy the TV Pack 2008 Excuse</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/sorry-engadget-i-dont-buy-the-tv-pack-2008-lie-900.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/sorry-engadget-i-dont-buy-the-tv-pack-2008-lie-900.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv pack 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engadget HD posted an article that really was disingenuous, in my opinion. I&#8217;d link to it, but that would be giving them a SEO benefit for poor work. Basically, the article initially claimed that it had found out why Microsoft never released Vista Media Center TV Pack 2008 to end users. Unfortunately, when you hit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engadget HD posted an article that really was disingenuous, in my opinion. I&#8217;d link to it, but that would be giving them a SEO benefit for poor work. Basically, the article initially claimed that it had found out why Microsoft never released Vista Media Center TV Pack 2008 to end users.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, when you hit the Read More link, the article was nothing more than an editorial&#8230; and even concluded that its initial premise (of getting to the bottom of this) wasn&#8217;t really found. Great way to lure in readers, Entrapet?</p>
<p>Even that said, I don&#8217;t buy the premise which they were making. That premise was that TV Pack 2008 was meant to train OEMs in the United States on what Windows 7 Media Center would entail, and give European customers DVB-T tuning support. And, also that OEMs were informed that they would want to avoid shipping TV Pack 2008 to customers, because of its unreliable state.</p>
<p>This is the point where I put my hand on my face and sigh a lot. First, OEMs must never have gotten that memo, if Entrapet HD is to be interpreted correctly&#8230; because everyone from HP to top-tier premium HTPC manufacturers have been shipping TV Pack 2008 since when it started shipping. Two, bad behavior doesn&#8217;t justify good intentions. TV Pack 2008 is buggy, everyone knows that&#8230; that&#8217;s why Microsoft starts to stutter when you ask about it. It doesn&#8217;t mean that it was a beta or developer preview.</p>
<p>Why? Because Microsoft releases developer previews and betas all the time. If they wanted OEMs to not ship a product, they&#8217;d do that like they always do. And, unlike Entrapet&#8217;s assertion that only enthusiasts are ticked about TV Pack 2008&#8230; that&#8217;s quite false. Many average people bought into the Vista Media Center and CableCARD waves, looking to replace their TiVo. Now they get nothing but FUD about the solution, well until recently. Now they&#8217;re told to just wait (and pay) for the bug fixes in Windows 7.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my take. And, this is only my take, not something I&#8217;m going to write off as &#8220;getting to the bottom of it.&#8221; I think that at some point, Microsoft realized Vista had failed. So, the team began working on Windows 7.</p>
<p>But, at the same time, they realized that they promised Europe DVB-T, and Hauppauge wanted to offer the HD PVR with Media Center. Oh, and the CableCARD people were fuming about their $3,000 systems not working right. An update had to be made.</p>
<p>And, so it was made. Unfortunately, like the rest of Vista, it too was a failure, due to countless bugs and problems (those are the bugs and problems that we TV Pack 2008 users suffer/suffered with&#8230; and Microsoft still has yet to fully admit to&#8230; and probably won&#8217;t until legal obligations/memories are long in the past). So, faced with splitting the difference, the HD PVR support was gutted (removing the H.264 components) and TV Pack 2008 went to the OEMs in Europe. Everyone else got the code bits to look at, but only because Microsoft wanted something to show for three years of work.</p>
<p>My advice to Microsoft: Give any CableCARD owner a free upgrade to Windows 7. That will start to heal the awful track record of TV Pack 2008, even for those still waiting for its features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/sorry-engadget-i-dont-buy-the-tv-pack-2008-lie-900.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Wren Picks Apart TV Pack 2008 Woes, I Tell MS How to Save Media Center</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/mike-wren-picks-apart-tv-pack-2008-woes-i-tell-ms-how-to-save-media-center-831.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/mike-wren-picks-apart-tv-pack-2008-woes-i-tell-ms-how-to-save-media-center-831.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve already picked apart all the problems surrounding TV Pack 2008, CableCARD DRM, and all the things wrong in the world with Windows Media Center today. And, I could spend a good 15 minutes linking back to all the posts, and all the amens from all the Media Center MVPs and Experts on my blog. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already picked apart all the problems surrounding TV Pack 2008, CableCARD DRM, and all the things wrong in the world with Windows Media Center today. And, I could spend a good 15 minutes linking back to all the posts, and all the amens from all the Media Center MVPs and Experts on my blog.</p>
<p>But, I don&#8217;t want to do that today&#8230; it&#8217;s beating a dead horse. I would however like to point out when others do the same thing. Mike Wren has done that quite <a href="http://mikewren.com/vista-bugs-only-fixed-in-windows7">eloquently on his own blog</a>. And, he echos what many are saying, and what I may be resigned to accept&#8230; that Microsoft is going to force people (many of whom have paid thousands of dollars for their CableCARD rigs) to pony up for Windows 7 to fix those bugs.</p>
<p>That is going to fail Microsoft, I&#8217;m warning you now so that I can say that I did later. These people are the ones you don&#8217;t want to tick off, because they will wind up telling everyone to go to what TiVo is brewing, just as soon as it comes out of the gates. And, they will too&#8230; leaving Windows 7 Media Center devoid of both advocates&#8230; and savvy users.</p>
<p>They remember when they were supposed to get bug fixes, and they know who exactly to cast blame on.</p>
<p>They know what to reccomend to the hundreds of friends, family, and co-workers.</p>
<p>And, their opinion spreads like a virus to the rest of the non-tech community.</p>
<p>Microsoft, you still have time to fix this. There is still time to roll TV Pack 2008 into Vista Service Pack 2, and fix it. Please, take advantage of the Vista Service Pack 2 delay, and save Media Center&#8217;s face&#8230; Microsoft will be shooting themselves in the foot otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/mike-wren-picks-apart-tv-pack-2008-woes-i-tell-ms-how-to-save-media-center-831.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EDTV Lovers, Here&#8217;s Your Next TV</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/edtv-lovers-heres-your-next-tv-681.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/edtv-lovers-heres-your-next-tv-681.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32-inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soyo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JR.com is offering a Soyo 32-inch LCD EDTV for only $449.99. This is probably the best television on the market for playing Nintendo Wii or Sega Dreamcast games. It features HDMI, VGA, Component, S-Video, and Composite video inputs. As much as I&#8217;d like to buy one&#8230; it&#8217;s just too pricey. For under $400, you can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://images.jr.com/productimages/SOYSYJCP32B1AB.PNG?FTR=7&#038;CELL=210%2C210&#038;QLT=67&#038;CVT=jpeg" align="right">JR.com is offering a <a href="http://www.jr.com/soyo/pe/SOY_SYJCP32B1AB/">Soyo 32-inch LCD EDTV for only $449.99</a>. This is probably the best television on the market for playing Nintendo Wii or Sega Dreamcast games. It features HDMI, VGA, Component, S-Video, and Composite video inputs.</p>
<p>As much as I&#8217;d like to buy one&#8230; it&#8217;s just too pricey. For under $400, you can now buy a 32-inch 720p LCD television. While the need for EDTV won&#8217;t go away, it&#8217;s still being dangled out of price reach. Clearly EDTVs are falling in price (as well as in quantity), but they still haven&#8217;t found their place in the bargain range that they should be.</p>
<p>If this EDTV was $100 cheaper, I&#8217;d buy one. But, I know from <a href="http://http://www.christopherprice.net/where-have-all-the-edtvs-gone-103.html">my last post</a> on EDTV, there are people who still want one&#8230; so, if you&#8217;re in the market, enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/edtv-lovers-heres-your-next-tv-681.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hauppauge 1212 HD-PVR: It Just Works</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/hauppauge-1212-hd-pvr-it-just-works-569.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.christopherprice.net/hauppauge-1212-hd-pvr-it-just-works-569.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing & Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1212]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hauppauge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd-pvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had my concerns about the Hauppauge 1212 HD PVR. First, it lost Media Center support (thanks to Microsoft gutting H.264 from TV Pack 2008 at the last minute). Then, it got delayed&#8230; a lot. But, when it comes to capturing HD video, there aren&#8217;t a lot of choices out there. A few FireWire boxes touted component [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0018LX0DY/ref=nosim/hatoncat-20"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41OVPuWj2FL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" alt="" align="right" /></a>I had my concerns about the Hauppauge 1212 HD PVR. First, it lost Media Center support (thanks to Microsoft gutting H.264 from TV Pack 2008 at the last minute). Then, it got delayed&#8230; a lot.</p>
<p>But, when it comes to capturing HD video, there aren&#8217;t a lot of choices out there. A few FireWire boxes touted component in, but they didn&#8217;t have the processing power to handle HD video. There are a few cards out there which are cheap, but the ones below the HD PVR&#8217;s $249 price tag, suffer from the same video-audio sync issues.</p>
<p>I was pleasantly surprised to find that the HD PVR just works. It captures video without trouble, and it puts video on the computer in a state that you can actually edit.</p>
<p>There are a couple of flaws. First, it puts video in the horrific .TS file. I believe that this was due to the chipset that Happuage had to go with to meet the price tag. Thankfully, they include an MP4 converter. Unfortunately though, the MP4 converter botches the header tags&#8230; preventing the files from loading in QuickTime (and yes, that includes Apple TV, iTunes, iMovie, and Final Cut). Ouch.</p>
<p>But, there is a quick fix, <a href="http://www.techspansion.com/visualhub/">VisualHub</a> will turn the .TS H.264 file into a H.264, or an (oversized) standard MPEG-4 file, without any trouble. VisualHub is only $24, and considering <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0018LX0DY/ref=nosim/hatoncat-20">Amazon.com chops $40 off the retail price</a>, you&#8217;re still saving money versus competing products.</p>
<p>Did I mention that it&#8217;s the only capture box (with a reasonable price tag) that will capture 5.1 surround sound, in addition to capturing 1080i in H.264? Yeah, that&#8217;s hot.</p>
<p>Bottom line: I love my HD-PVR. It lets me capture HD video up to 1080i, without costing me an arm and a leg. Unfortunately, the lack of Media Center support means that it really isn&#8217;t going to serve it&#8217;s original purpose (of being, well, an HD-PVR), but it does make the best capture device on the market for prosumers.</p>
<p>Room for improvement: Mac support, banish the .TS format, Media Center support (beg Microsoft for an updated TV Pack 2008).</p>
<p>And, to show it in action, here&#8217;s my HD PVR capturing an Xbox 360 bug. I took the H.264 TS file, and ran it through VisualHub, converting it to an MPEG-4 on maximum quality.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.christopherprice.net/files/2008/09/xbox-sonic-crash.mp4">Xbox 360 Bug (MPEG-4, 26.5 MB)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0018LX0DY/ref=nosim/hatoncat-20">Buy an HD-PVR from Amazon.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christopherprice.net/hauppauge-1212-hd-pvr-it-just-works-569.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.christopherprice.net/files/2008/09/xbox-sonic-crash.mp4" length="0" type="video/mp4" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
