<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joomla Still Doesn&#8217;t Get it on Migrating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html</link>
	<description>Wireless consumer advocate Christopher Price tackles the rest of tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Migration of the main site &#124; Kybernesis</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html/comment-page-1#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Migration of the main site &#124; Kybernesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html#comment-643</guid>
		<description>[...] I stumbled over this blog by Christopher Price[^] and I decided to take Joomla out in my backyard and shoot it in all my mercy. So now I have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I stumbled over this blog by Christopher Price[^] and I decided to take Joomla out in my backyard and shoot it in all my mercy. So now I have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joomla Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html/comment-page-1#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Joomla Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html#comment-640</guid>
		<description>A funny coincidence that your thoughts are turning to migrating, I have been thinking the same thing.

http://www.compassdesigns.net/joomla-blog/general-joomla/migrating-to-joomla-1.5.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A funny coincidence that your thoughts are turning to migrating, I have been thinking the same thing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.compassdesigns.net/joomla-blog/general-joomla/migrating-to-joomla-1.5.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.compassdesigns.net/joomla-blog/general-joomla/migrating-to-joomla-1.5.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Price</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html/comment-page-1#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html#comment-638</guid>
		<description>I think my comparison is valid in that regard, because Joomla 1.5 has a legacy mode for older components. Like Mac OS X, Joomla 1.0 code is run in legacy mode, just like Mac OS 9 code was run under Classic.

The problem is, unlike Classic, which ran Mac OS 9 flawlessly in most cases, Joomla&#039;s legacy mode is horribly flawed.

That creates underlying problems like a lack of reliable legacy backlink handling... which means viewers using bookmarks (as well as Google&#039;s crawler) are presented with 404&#039;s instead of content on a migrated site.

But you are right that Apple maintained support for Mac OS 9 during the transition. Joomla has assured security patches for Joomla 1.0 until January 2009. That&#039;s a bit of a mixed blessing... unlike desktop computing, the CMS world is faster-paced, you can quickly lose market share (ask PHP-Nuke).

Joomla will need to have a stable, simple, and proven migration process long before 2009, otherwise I doubt the project will sustain itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my comparison is valid in that regard, because Joomla 1.5 has a legacy mode for older components. Like Mac OS X, Joomla 1.0 code is run in legacy mode, just like Mac OS 9 code was run under Classic.</p>
<p>The problem is, unlike Classic, which ran Mac OS 9 flawlessly in most cases, Joomla&#8217;s legacy mode is horribly flawed.</p>
<p>That creates underlying problems like a lack of reliable legacy backlink handling&#8230; which means viewers using bookmarks (as well as Google&#8217;s crawler) are presented with 404&#8217;s instead of content on a migrated site.</p>
<p>But you are right that Apple maintained support for Mac OS 9 during the transition. Joomla has assured security patches for Joomla 1.0 until January 2009. That&#8217;s a bit of a mixed blessing&#8230; unlike desktop computing, the CMS world is faster-paced, you can quickly lose market share (ask PHP-Nuke).</p>
<p>Joomla will need to have a stable, simple, and proven migration process long before 2009, otherwise I doubt the project will sustain itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html/comment-page-1#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Your comparison is interesting but slightly flawed. In many cases, migration didn&#039;t occur for Mac users...we kept OS 9 running in the background until apps came out that would work natively (some never did). It was some time before Jobs called OS 9 dead....not immediately.

However your comparison is good in describing a complete re-write to Mac users (I&#039;ll be doing that on my site) and also explaining how legacy mode in Joomla is kinda like Classic on a Mac.

Like my Mac migration, I&#039;ll be taking my time and planning it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comparison is interesting but slightly flawed. In many cases, migration didn&#8217;t occur for Mac users&#8230;we kept OS 9 running in the background until apps came out that would work natively (some never did). It was some time before Jobs called OS 9 dead&#8230;.not immediately.</p>
<p>However your comparison is good in describing a complete re-write to Mac users (I&#8217;ll be doing that on my site) and also explaining how legacy mode in Joomla is kinda like Classic on a Mac.</p>
<p>Like my Mac migration, I&#8217;ll be taking my time and planning it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joomla Components Extensions Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joomla Still Doesn’t Get it on Migrating</title>
		<link>http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html/comment-page-1#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Joomla Components Extensions Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joomla Still Doesn’t Get it on Migrating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/joomla-still-doesnt-get-it-on-migrating-216.html#comment-636</guid>
		<description>[...] was out on the web today when I came across an article from someone who doesn&#8217;t normally blog ablout Joomla, but about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was out on the web today when I came across an article from someone who doesn&#8217;t normally blog ablout Joomla, but about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
