<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Vintage PS3&#8230; Gets Better With Age</title> <atom:link href="http://www.christopherprice.net/vintage-ps3-gets-better-with-age-42.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.christopherprice.net/vintage-ps3-gets-better-with-age-42.html</link> <description>Christopher Price tackles the rest of tech.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Humberto Saabedra</title><link>http://www.christopherprice.net/vintage-ps3-gets-better-with-age-42.html/comment-page-1#comment-124</link> <dc:creator>Humberto Saabedra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:32:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopherprice.net/2007/10/10/vintage-ps3-gets-better-with-age/#comment-124</guid> <description>Interesting perception, though I will say that the majority of people that care about this feature are attached to Japanese RPGS and other such obscure games, and are looking for a reason to justify the relatively high price tag compared to the savings in expenditure if they just kept a PS2 handy.
I own many a 20GB and 60GB model and use them as a POSIX cluster when not spending hours shaving thousandths of a second in F1 Championship Edition or playing the many other racing games available.
I own many PS1 and PS2 games and while upscaling is neat, it still isn&#039;t enough to keep manufacturing the console with the EE+GS if the intention is to push the next console.
I tell people that want a PS3 and want to keep their old games to keep a PS2 around for that reason because there is no way to make everyone happy.
It was stated that backwards compatibility would be a feature but then people complained about the cost of the console. Sony is responding to repeated complaints about price and people still aren&#039;t happy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting perception, though I will say that the majority of people that care about this feature are attached to Japanese RPGS and other such obscure games, and are looking for a reason to justify the relatively high price tag compared to the savings in expenditure if they just kept a PS2 handy.</p><p>I own many a 20GB and 60GB model and use them as a POSIX cluster when not spending hours shaving thousandths of a second in F1 Championship Edition or playing the many other racing games available.</p><p>I own many PS1 and PS2 games and while upscaling is neat, it still isn&#8217;t enough to keep manufacturing the console with the EE+GS if the intention is to push the next console.</p><p>I tell people that want a PS3 and want to keep their old games to keep a PS2 around for that reason because there is no way to make everyone happy.</p><p>It was stated that backwards compatibility would be a feature but then people complained about the cost of the console. Sony is responding to repeated complaints about price and people still aren&#8217;t happy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
